Science Advances Vs Nature Communications: Which Journal Is Better For Scientists?

Publishing research in a reputable scientific journal is crucial for scientists looking to advance their careers and gain recognition in the community. Two of the top multidisciplinary science journals that researchers aim to publish in are Science Advances and Nature Communications.

But how do you choose between them?

If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer to your question: Nature Communications has a higher impact factor and prestige, but Science Advances provides open access publishing and faster publication times. Each journal has its own strengths and best fits different researcher needs.

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll compare the key factors you should consider when deciding where to submit your next paper between Science Advances and Nature Communications. We’ll look at impact factor, open access options, time to publication, readership and reach, costs, and more.

Whether you’re just starting your science career or are an established researcher, read on to learn which journal is better suited for your work.

Impact Factor and Prestige

Nature Communications Has a Higher Impact Factor

When it comes to assessing the influence and reach of scientific journals, one of the most commonly used metrics is the Impact Factor. This metric measures the average number of citations received by articles published in a particular journal during a specific time period.

It is widely regarded as an indicator of the journal’s importance and prestige within the scientific community.

In the case of Science Advances and Nature Communications, Nature Communications boasts a higher Impact Factor. According to the latest data, Nature Communications has an Impact Factor of X, while Science Advances has an Impact Factor of Y.

This indicates that, on average, articles published in Nature Communications are cited more frequently by other researchers, suggesting a higher level of significance and influence in the scientific community.

Both Journals Have Strong Reputations and Readership

While Impact Factor is an important measure, it is not the sole determining factor when it comes to the prestige and reputation of scientific journals. Both Science Advances and Nature Communications have established themselves as reputable publications within their respective fields.

Science Advances, published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), is an open-access journal that covers a broad range of scientific disciplines. It has gained recognition for its commitment to publishing cutting-edge research and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration.

Nature Communications, on the other hand, is part of the prestigious Nature Publishing Group. It focuses on the natural sciences and covers a wide array of disciplines, including biology, chemistry, physics, and earth sciences.

The journal’s rigorous peer-review process and high editorial standards have contributed to its strong reputation among scientists.

Both journals have a large readership and are widely read by researchers, scholars, and professionals in their respective fields. They provide a platform for scientists to showcase their work and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their areas of expertise.

Ultimately, the choice between Science Advances and Nature Communications depends on the specific needs and goals of individual researchers. It is important to consider factors such as the scope of the journal, the target audience, and the specific field of research before making a decision on where to submit a manuscript.

Open Access Options

Science Advances Provides Full Open Access

When it comes to open access options, Science Advances stands out as a leader in the field. The journal offers full open access to all of its articles, meaning that anyone can read, download, and share the research without any paywalls or subscription fees.

This is a significant advantage for scientists, as it allows for greater visibility and dissemination of their work. Additionally, the open access model encourages collaboration and innovation by removing barriers to accessing scientific knowledge.

According to a study conducted by the Max Planck Digital Library, researchers who publish in open access journals like Science Advances receive, on average, 18% more citations compared to those published in traditional subscription-based journals.

This indicates that open access publications have a higher impact and reach within the scientific community.

With Science Advances, scientists can be confident that their work will be freely available to a global audience, fostering greater collaboration and advancing scientific progress.

Nature Communications Offers Optional Open Access

Nature Communications, on the other hand, takes a slightly different approach to open access. While the journal does offer an open access option, it is not a default setting. Authors have the choice to make their articles open access by paying an article processing charge (APC).

This can be a deterrent for some scientists, especially those working in institutions with limited funding.

However, it is worth noting that Nature Communications has a strong reputation and is widely recognized as a prestigious journal in the scientific community. Publishing in Nature Communications can significantly enhance a scientist’s career and increase the visibility of their research.

Furthermore, the optional open access model allows authors to choose whether they want to make their work freely available to the public or keep it behind a paywall. This flexibility can be advantageous for researchers who want to balance the need for visibility with the financial considerations of open access publishing.

Ultimately, the choice between Science Advances and Nature Communications for open access options depends on the individual scientist’s priorities and circumstances. While Science Advances provides full open access, Nature Communications offers the prestige and flexibility of optional open access.

Science Advances Nature Communications
Open Access Availability Full Open Access Optional Open Access
Visibility and Collaboration Greater visibility and collaboration due to open access Prestige and visibility in the scientific community
Citations 18% more citations on average High impact and recognition within the scientific community
Financial Considerations No paywalls or subscription fees Article processing charge for optional open access

Time to Publication

Science Advances Publishes Papers Faster

When it comes to the time it takes for scientific papers to be published, Science Advances has a clear advantage over Nature Communications. Researchers who submit their work to Science Advances can expect a faster publication process, allowing their findings to reach the scientific community and the public more quickly.

One of the reasons for Science Advances’ prompt publication timeline is its efficient review process. The journal employs a rigorous yet streamlined peer review system that ensures thorough evaluation of submitted manuscripts without unnecessary delays.

This allows researchers to receive feedback and make necessary revisions in a timely manner, ultimately leading to a more efficient publication process.

In addition to its efficient review process, Science Advances also benefits from its online-only publication format. Unlike traditional print journals, Science Advances does not have to wait for a specific issue to be compiled before releasing new papers.

This means that once a paper has completed the review process, it can be published online almost immediately, ensuring a faster dissemination of scientific knowledge.

Nature Communications Has Slower Review Process

While Nature Communications is highly regarded for its reputation in the scientific community, one area where it falls behind Science Advances is in the speed of its review process. Researchers who submit their work to Nature Communications may experience a longer wait time before their papers are published.

Nature Communications’ review process involves multiple rounds of evaluation, which can lead to a longer overall timeline from submission to publication. This thoroughness is intended to ensure the highest quality of published research, but it does come at the cost of increased publication time.

It is important to note that the slower review process of Nature Communications does not necessarily mean a lower standard of quality. In fact, Nature Communications is known for its stringent peer review and high impact factor, which signifies the significance and influence of the published research.

However, for researchers who prioritize a quicker publication timeline, Science Advances might be the preferred choice.

Ultimately, the decision of which journal to choose depends on the specific needs and goals of the researcher. Some may prioritize the prestige and impact factor of Nature Communications, while others may value the faster publication process offered by Science Advances.

It is always recommended for researchers to carefully consider the pros and cons of each journal before making a decision.

Readership and Discoverability

Nature Communications Has Wider Reach Globally

When it comes to readership and global reach, Nature Communications undoubtedly holds a distinct advantage. With its long-standing reputation and wide distribution network, the journal has a larger readership base compared to Science Advances.

The articles published in Nature Communications are accessible to a vast audience of researchers, scientists, and scholars from various disciplines across the globe. This extensive readership increases the potential for greater exposure and impact of the research published in the journal.

According to recent statistics, Nature Communications has an impressive global readership, with a significant portion of its readership coming from countries such as the United States, China, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

Additionally, the journal’s online presence and indexing in major scientific databases further contribute to its discoverability and accessibility to researchers worldwide.

Science Advances Part of Leading Science Family

While Nature Communications has a broader readership, Science Advances holds its own unique advantages. Science Advances is part of the renowned Science family of journals, which includes the prestigious journal Science.

Being associated with such a respected and reputable family of journals undoubtedly adds to the credibility and prestige of Science Advances.

Moreover, Science Advances benefits from the strong reputation and recognition of the Science family in the scientific community. This association can attract high-quality submissions and encourage researchers to consider publishing their breakthrough findings in Science Advances.

The journal’s affiliation with the Science family also provides an opportunity for cross-promotion and visibility among the readership of other Science journals, potentially increasing discoverability within the scientific community.

It’s worth noting that while Nature Communications may have a wider global reach, Science Advances has its own distinct advantages within the scientific community. Researchers should carefully consider their target audience and goals when deciding which journal may be better suited for their research.

Costs to Publish

When it comes to publishing scientific research, cost is a significant factor that scientists must consider. Both Science Advances and Nature Communications have different pricing structures for authors to publish their work.

Science Advances Charges Lower APCs

Science Advances is known for its relatively lower Article Processing Charges (APCs) compared to other high-impact journals. This makes it a more affordable option for scientists who want to publish their research.

The journal offers a tiered pricing structure, with different APCs depending on the author’s affiliation. For example, authors affiliated with institutions from low-income countries pay a significantly lower fee than those from high-income countries.

This approach ensures that researchers from diverse backgrounds have access to a reputable publication without financial constraints.

Nature Communications More Expensive for Open Access

On the other hand, Nature Communications is generally considered more expensive, especially for authors who choose the open access option. Open access allows anyone to freely access and read the published research.

While this is a valuable feature for increasing the visibility and impact of scientific work, it often comes with additional costs. Authors publishing in Nature Communications through the open access route are required to pay a higher APC compared to those publishing through the traditional subscription model.

It is important to note that both journals may offer waivers or discounts for authors who are unable to afford the publication fees. These opportunities can be explored by contacting the respective journals directly and providing a justification for financial assistance.

Science Advances Nature Communications
APC Varies based on author’s affiliation Higher, particularly for open access
Waivers/Discounts Available for authors in need Available for authors in need

It is essential for scientists to weigh the costs and benefits of publishing in both journals based on their individual circumstances. While Science Advances may offer lower APCs, Nature Communications is recognized as a prestigious journal with a wide readership.

Ultimately, the decision on which journal is better for scientists will depend on various factors, including the researcher’s budget, the importance of open access, and the target audience for their work.

For more information on Science Advances, please visit their official website:

For more information on Nature Communications, please visit their official website:


In summary, Nature Communications edges out Science Advances when it comes to impact factor and prestige in the scientific community. However, Science Advances offers clear advantages with open access publishing, faster review and publication times, and lower article processing charges.

Ultimately, the best journal to publish in depends on your research area, budget, and priorities like reaching a wide audience or getting your work out quickly.

For most disciplines, you can’t go wrong publishing in either Nature Communications or Science Advances. Evaluate the differences covered here and think about which journal aligns better with your goals and needs as a researcher.

Both provide great platforms for disseminating cutting-edge science globally. Good luck with your submission!

Keywords: science advances, nature communications, scientific publishing, open access, journal comparison, impact factor, journal prestige.

Similar Posts